Friday, 29 February 2008

Primary Education Report

Today BBC Education tells of a Cambridge-based report concerning the health of primary education in this country.

It doesn't seem long since I last blogged about this ...

'A narrowing of the curriculum has led to a decrease in the quality of English primary schooling, says a report.
"High stakes" testing of pupils has led to a system "focused on literacy and numeracy at the expense of the broader curriculum", it suggests.

The Cambridge-based Primary Review's report claims this has contributed to a "state theory of learning".
'

Again the report comments on the damaging nature of the overload of testing and targets and states:

"The evidence on the impact of the various initiatives on standards of pupil attainment is at best equivocal and at worst negative. While test scores have risen since the mid 1990s, this has been achieved at the expense of children's entitlement to a broad and balanced curriculum and by the diversion of considerable teaching time to test preparation."

So the concept of a broad and balance curriculum is alive and well in educators' minds but does not find its way wholly into classrooms and make the desirable impact on children's lives. Are we surprised by this?

The Government, rather predictably states:

"Once again we see a collection of recycled, partial or out of date research.
We do not accept these claims. We are currently engaged in a review of the primary curriculum, as set out in the Children's Plan, which will build on a decade of success in raising standards – success which has been validated on numerous occasions by independent experts.
The government does not accept that our children are over-tested."


Just as a thought :' The Primary Review is an independent inquiry which is looking at 10 major themes before publishing final recommendations in October 2008.' I wonder if the research will be out of date?

2 Comments:

At 01 March 2008 10:13 , Anonymous John Sutton said...

Don't you just hate the way the Gov refuses to debate the issue by simply spinning the old "out of date research" line. My bang up to date research (a child in Y6 this currently, and one in Y6 last year, plus visits to several hundred primary schools over the last few years) tells me that the narrowing of the curriculum switches kids off school. In many primary schools Y6 is a waste of a year. Just this week I walked up to the front door of a school with the rather ominous sign "Quiet, tests in progress". This Government's obsession with stats and the need to constantly prove they are right is doing more harm than people generally realise. Could the rise in yob culture be in any way linked to a boring, exam focused and increasingly irrelevant curriculum?

 
At 03 March 2008 16:21 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

They will persist on calling it

‘the basics’.

Why this separation of learning?

‘Learning for Life’

Implies continuum.

Surely.

sad really.

Damned at 11. Still!

Everyone’s got to be ready for 11, even if they are not.

Why?

Perhaps the ‘rest of the curriculum’ needs to be made accessible

not vice versa.



Every Child Counts.

Every Teacher knows.

But more intiatives.

Hmm. No Thanks.

The experts think

‘Specialist Teachers’

Sorry they’ve got classes of 30 or more, can’t make it.

‘High Stakes testing’

‘narrowing of the curriculum’

We told you so, years ago.

No-one took any notice.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home